Search
Loading...

Discussions

Loading...

All readers are invited to comment on the TEDGreenRoom.com Blogs. Some comments may be reprinted elsewhere online or offline. We ask that you refrain from inappropriate language, personal attacks, or sharing of any confidential or false information. Comments that contain profanities are automatically screened and deleted. NAED monitors user generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, or reject a posting for any reason at any time. NAED shall have no liability to any author for its removal or rejection of any posting or comments.

Going Green Inside and Out

by Jerry Yudelson

Get Ahead of EPA Regulations

 Permanent link

Corporations are increasingly trying to get ahead of the regulatory curve by reducing their use of hazardous chemicals through sustainability planning and goal setting. A prime example in your own industry comes from Southwire.

As you likely know, this company is a progressive wire and cable manufacturer based in Carrollton, Georgia. In 2008 the company set an ambitious goal of eliminating lead additives from all of their products, and began using sustainability as a framework through which every aspect of the business was viewed.[1]

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) currently oversees the 82,000-pluschemicals currently in the market. Under TSCA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must meet stringent requirements in order to prove that a chemical poses a health threat and needs to be restricted or banned. This differs significantly from the EU’s REACH regulations under which the manufacturers are responsible for proving that their products are safe.[2]

In October 2009, EPA administrator Lisa Jackson announced the core principles that outline the Obama Administration’s goals for chemical management. The principles, which are intended to help Congress reform TSCA, are as follows:[3]

  • Chemicals should be reviewed against risk-based safety standards based on sound science and protective of human health and the environment

  • Manufacturers should provide EPA with the necessary information to conclude that new and existing chemicals are safe and do not endanger public health or the environment

  • EPA should have clear authority to take risk management actions when chemicals do not meet the safety standard, with flexibility to take into account sensitive subpopulations, costs, social benefits, equity and other relevant considerations

  • Manufacturers and EPA should assess and act on priority chemicals, both existing and new, in a timely manner

  • Green Chemistry should be encouraged and provisions assuring Transparency and Public Access to Information should be strengthened

  • EPA should be given a sustained source of funding for implementation

 


[1] Winn Wise, personal interview, February 23, 2009.

[2] http://www.GreenerDesign.com/news/2009/03/02/chemical-industry-health-and-environment-groups-push-us- 

toxics-law-reform accessed October 14, 2009.

[3] http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/D07993FDCF801C2285257640005D27A6 accessed October 14, 2009.


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment